Saltar al contenido
TrusteeClear
Menú

Centro de evidencias

La evidencia detrás de lo que TrusteeClear afirma, cada elemento con su compilación, sus verificaciones y la fecha que describe, y un archivo para llevar.

El texto completo de esta guía está en inglés; el resumen anterior está en su idioma. Los resúmenes de las leyes y el inglés siguen siendo la fuente de referencia.

Índice de evidencias

Evidence index
EvidenceWhat it showsAs ofReview
SecurityThe controls that operate today, and what is not yet claimedCurrent as of this build
Providers and data flowsEvery provider that processes data, with its purpose, data, region and statusCurrent as of this build
Capability referenceWhat each capability does, refuses and limits, and whether it is available on this deploymentCurrent as of this build
Trust Receipt verificationChecks a receipt against its recorded factsCurrent as of this build
FiduciaryBench92 deterministic cases on every change; the last recorded model-in-the-loop run, marked historicalCurrent as of this build
Accessibility statementWhat was evaluated, how, and the known limitationsCurrent as of this buildNext: 2026-11-16
Accessibility conformance report55 WCAG 2.2 criteria with their conformance levelsCurrent as of this buildNext: 2026-11-16
Statute coverageThe Florida Trust Code sections the product relies on, mapped to their dutiesCurrent as of this build
Data processing addendumThe processor terms for a firm's client dataCurrent as of this build

Cifras publicadas

Source-tree counts are read from the surface inventory committed at this build's commit; the continuous-integration verify job fails whenever that inventory differs from the source tree. Production counts carry the date they were observed.

Published counts with their scope
CountValueScope and source
Page files116Source tree at this build's commit
API routes (active of all, each with an enforced policy row)141 of 152Source tree at this build's commit
Scheduled jobs7Source tree at this build's commit
Languages7Source tree at this build's commit
Unit test files · SQL suites · end-to-end specs209 · 17 · 14Source tree at this build's commit
Production tables with row-level security121 of 121Production catalog, observed 2026-09-24
FiduciaryBench deterministic cases92Source tree at this build's commit; every case runs on every change
FiduciaryBench last recorded model-in-the-loop run (historical)12 of 12 casesRun 2026-08-10 at commit 43a9217; the current red-team list has 10 scenarios and no run of it is recorded
WCAG 2.2 criteria evaluated55 (50 supports · 2 partially · 3 not applicable)Conformance report dated 2026-09-18

Rechazos y límites

Each refusal or limit names the rule it serves. The first six speak to people using the website on their own.

  • No lawyer reviews your documents on this website

    Legal review exists only when a law firm provides TrusteeClear to its own client. On the website, the organizers and forms carry no review or approval by anyone.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I1

  • No AI chats with you or writes to you

    Software may extract dates, names and amounts from a document you upload so you can confirm them. It never converses, answers questions or writes text for you.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I2

  • No review of your trust and no advice about what it lacks

    The desk can show a difference between two of your own records and the statute it relates to. It never says whether a trust is valid or complete, and never tells you what to fix.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I3

  • The Duty Coach teaches; it does not direct

    Each lesson names the statute it explains and what the statute provides. No lesson tells you what to do in your situation.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I4

  • Your decisions stay yours

    No one at TrusteeClear approves, files or sends anything for you. You send your notices and record what you did.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I5

  • Legal advice comes from a lawyer you choose

    Where a step has legal consequences, the desk names the statute and suggests a licensed Florida attorney of your choosing.

    Rule: Claims register: consult-counsel notices

  • TrusteeClear drafts no wills, trusts or attorney letters

    Drafting lives on the sister platforms: EstateDraftFL for estate plans and DraftCounsel for all other attorney drafting. TrusteeClear administers the trust.

    Rule: Claims register: sister-platform drafting pointers

  • Nothing is filed or sent on anyone's behalf

    Forms and notices fill their factual blanks from the record; a person edits, sends or files them and records the delivery. The software prepares nothing for anyone and files nothing.

    Rule: Claims register: self-help forms and notices

  • No model writes a word or a number into a court form, notice or accounting

    Court forms, statutory notices, packets and fee disclosures are assembled from deterministic templates, and accounting totals are computed from ledger rows.

    Rule: Generative boundary: level L2

  • A file opens only after a scanner marks it clean

    An uploaded file waits in quarantine. Until a scan records it clean, it cannot be downloaded, previewed, parsed, sent for signature or treated as clean anywhere in the product.

    Rule: Document scanning policy

  • An unread record is reported as unknown, never as empty

    A count that could not be read shows as unavailable instead of zero, and a summary names what it could not read. Only a complete or genuinely empty read can produce an all-clear.

    Rule: Read coverage contract

  • Generative AI is reachable only by a law firm's staff

    Model prose is produced only behind a firm-staff session in a law-firm tenant and reaches a client only after an attorney acts on it. Sandbox and demonstration sessions are refused.

    Rule: Consumer-lane rule I2 and the generative gate

  • Only an eligible attorney can approve a deliverable

    Approval requires a current Florida credential, an active assignment to the matter, a clear conflict check and a recent second factor, and it binds the exact artifact reviewed. The database refuses anyone else.

    Rule: Claims register: attorney review on firm tenants

  • A citation that does not resolve is flagged, never shown as authority

    Research answers draw only on the attested statute library, and retrieval fails closed: a section outside the library renders as an unverified flag.

    Rule: Generative boundary: research engine

  • The platform API reads matters and writes nothing

    Version 1 lists a firm's own matters with a machine key. It has no write endpoints, no document content, no beneficiary data and nothing across tenants.

    Rule: Platform API scope

  • Model use stops at the monthly spend ceiling

    The model gateway refuses a call once the platform's monthly ceiling is reached, and a failure of the ceiling check refuses the call too.

    Rule: Abuse controls: spend ceiling

  • A benchmark result speaks only for the run it records

    Each Tier B result names its date, its commit and its own case count. A historical run implies nothing about the current red-team list, and no newer pass is claimed.

    Rule: FiduciaryBench scorecard

  • No certification or assessment is claimed before it exists

    SOC 2 is on the roadmap and no report exists yet. An independent security assessment has been prepared but not performed.

    Rule: Independent assessment record

  • Accessibility statements say only what the evidence shows

    The statement and the conformance report describe the evaluated release and methods; neither claims full accessibility or legal compliance.

    Rule: Claims register: accessibility statement

Aún no afirmado

  • An independent security assessment has been scoped and its evidence pack prepared; it has not been performed, and no result is claimed.
  • SOC 2 is on the roadmap; no report exists yet.
  • A managed-backup restore drill has not yet been run into an isolated target; the restore procedure is rehearsed automatically on every change.

Paquete de diligencia debida

One file with this build's identity, the capability reference with availability, the providers, the limitations and this index — for a firm's security questionnaire or vendor review.

Descargar el paquete de diligencia debida (Markdown)

Esta compilación

Source commit
9b7ff8f1f1c49e6088a15c891886364873e9e665
Built
Release run
36096103588 (attempt 1)
Required checks
  • CI (verify, end-to-end, Lighthouse gate): run 36095197104 (attempt 1)
  • Row-level security matrix: run 36095197149 (attempt 1)
  • Security scan (secrets, static analysis, dependencies): run 36095197106 (attempt 1)

Availability and counts on this page were computed when this build ran, from its own configuration and the records committed at its source commit.